No information
February 9, 2016
1918-B006-I:08
1921-B014:11 Symposium II rating: 8.1
1923-SPN:345
1928-B:31 Double. 8.1 (Sym. 1921). Lilac-rose.
1928-B-d:094 Much overrated and suppressed by vote of the Directors.
1976-K:028 (Terry, 1920) - (Manual check list says 1890) - Double - Lilac Rose. SURPRESSED. M.
February 9, 2016
1921-B014:13 Symposium II rating: 9.6
1923-018:28 Rg Form: Semi-rose, with stamens in center. Size: Large. Color: Total effect, deep rosy pink. Guards, deep rosy pink with deep carmine streaks. Collar next guards, same color as guards. Extreme center, some petals with crimson tips and central line of crimson reaching nearly to the base;...
February 9, 2016
1918-B006-I:16
1921-B014:16 Symposium II rating: 9.4
1923-SPN:348
1928-B:44 Double. 9.0 (Sym. 1925). Flesh-white.
1928-B-d:120 Double type; very large; late midseason. Guards cupped and rounded, surrounding a collar of shredded petals and stamens and a deep symmetrical center of long, narrow petals with a few rose-...
February 9, 2016
1918-B006-I:21
1921-B014:19 Symposium II rating: 8.8
1923-SPN:350
1928-B:51 Double. 8.8 (Sym. 1921). Crimson.
1928-B-d:139 Double type; large; early. The broad guards and irregularly incurved high center are bright crimson; only slightly fragrant. Tall; floriferous; good stems and foliage. Valued for its earliness...
February 9, 2016
No information
February 9, 2016
February 9, 2016
1916-Farr:33 Perfectly formed rose-shaped flower. Rich ruby-crimson, showing gold stamens. $5.
1918-B006-I:05
1921-B014:09 Symposium II rating: 7.8
1923-SPN:344
1928-B:27 Double. 7.8 (Sym. 1921). Crimson.
1953-B130:29 7.8. D. M. Rich, bright red. Medium height. This was considered by Mr. Brand to be one...
February 9, 2016
February 9, 2016
February 9, 2016