Site Search

 
Sort by:     Sort
  1. Sarah Carstensen

    1918-B006-I:21

    1921-B014:20 Symposium II rating: 8.6

    1923-SPN:350

    1928-B:52 Double. 8.5 (Sym. 1925). Pink.

    1928-B-d:141 Double type; large; midseason. Light rose-pink, a little paler in the collar and lightly marked with crimson in the center; not notably fragrant. Dwarf; very free-flowering; stiff stems. Good...

    February 9, 2016

  2. William F. Turner

    1918-B006-I:24

    1921-B014:21 Symposium II rating: 8.4

    1923-SPN:351

    1928-B:56 Double. 8.4 (Sym. 1925)- Crimson.

    1928-B-d:150 Double-type; large; early midseason. Very dark crimson petals with a blackish sheen mingled with yellow stamens; not fragrant. Tall; free-flowering; strong stems. Dark foliage. A loose, big-...

    February 9, 2016

  3. Vesuvian

    No information

    February 9, 2016

  4. Maud L. Richardson

    February 9, 2016

  5. H.F. Reddick

    No information

    February 9, 2016

  6. Thomas C. Thurlow

    No information

    February 9, 2016

  7. Black Prince

    February 9, 2016

  8. Better Times

    February 9, 2016

  9. Bride's Dream

    No information

    February 9, 2016

  10. Euphemia

    1918-B006-I:08

    1921-B014:11 Symposium II rating: 8.1

    1923-SPN:345

    1928-B:31 Double. 8.1 (Sym. 1921). Lilac-rose.

    1928-B-d:094 Much overrated and suppressed by vote of the Directors.

    1976-K:028 (Terry, 1920) - (Manual check list says 1890) - Double - Lilac Rose. SURPRESSED. M.

    February 9, 2016

Pages