Site Search

 
Sort by:     Sort
  1. Charles McKellip

    1916-Farr:33 Perfectly formed rose-shaped flower. Rich ruby-crimson, showing gold stamens. $5.

    1918-B006-I:05

    1921-B014:09 Symposium II rating: 7.8

    1923-SPN:344

    1928-B:27 Double. 7.8 (Sym. 1921). Crimson.

    1953-B130:29 7.8. D. M. Rich, bright red. Medium height. This was considered by Mr. Brand to be one of the...

    February 9, 2016

  2. Grover Cleveland

    February 9, 2016

  3. Cherry Hill

    1918-B006-I:05

    1921-B014:09 Symposium II rating: 8.6

    1923-SPN:344

    1928-B:27 Double. 8.6 (Sym. 1925). Red.

    1928-B-d:087 Double type; medium size; very early. Maroon, with a glistening sheen, brightened by yellow stamens and scarlet-tipped carpels. Very tall; floriferous; stems strong and erect but diverging. Foliage...

    February 9, 2016

  4. Rubra Superba

    Discarded

    February 9, 2016

  5. Euphemia

    1918-B006-I:08

    1921-B014:11 Symposium II rating: 8.1

    1923-SPN:345

    1928-B:31 Double. 8.1 (Sym. 1921). Lilac-rose.

    1928-B-d:094 Much overrated and suppressed by vote of the Directors.

    1976-K:028 (Terry, 1920) - (Manual check list says 1890) - Double - Lilac Rose. SURPRESSED. M.

    February 9, 2016

  6. Winnifred Domme

    February 9, 2016

  7. H. F. Reddick

    No information

    February 9, 2016

  8. Mrs. John M. Lewis

    No information

    February 9, 2016

  9. Irwin Altman

    1976-K:042 (Kelsey, 1940) - Double - Red - Midseason. Very fragrant. A very fine, clear glowing light red unlike any other red. Good form and pleasing color, full double with petals symmetrically arranged. Color is very distinctive in formation and most desirable List in Bulletin 109.

    1976-K:135

    1996-K:079 D. rose

    February 9, 2016

  10. H.F. Reddick

    No information

    February 9, 2016

Pages